|
Close Window
QUESTION:
Comments: Sir. I use much black and white 35mm and enlarge
selected photos to 11x14. I've been using this TMax film (i've been
out of photography for some time) and I'm not sure if it's the film
or not, but I'm not completely happy with the results. I shoot with
a lot of daylight and the images are harsh because, I believe, the
longer recommended developing time for TMax film as opposed to Tri-x.
The negatives are heavy even with reduced developing time. If TMax
is a better film, maybe there is something I should learn, or, perhaps,
go back to Tri-X. Any thoughts on this? Thank you.
MR. DRESSER'S ANSWER:
Edward: It has been my experience that T-Max can give you problems
when developed unless you are very precise with developing procedures
-i.e. dilutions, temperature and most important time. If you have
had good luck with Tri-X I would suggest you stay with it. Tri-X
with HC-110 (Dilution B) is wonderful combination and somewhat forgiving.
I use Agfa APX 100 and Rodinal (1:25) for my roll film.
From your description of you negatives it sounds as if you are
overexposing and over-developing them. If you have the ability and
resources to test your film I would suggest that, if not then lighten
up on your exposure and developing times. You get "heavy" negatives
from over-exposure not developing. Remember - exposure dictates
density and development dictates contrast.
Best regards, Rod Dresser
|